Your browser is not supported by khio.no. To view this site please upgrade or use another browser. If you can't use a modern browser, try disabling javascript, which will make khio.no simple, but mostly usable.

Supported browsers: Chrome 151, Firefox (Android) 153, Android WebView 151, Chrome 151, Chrome 150, Chrome 149, Chrome 148, Chrome 145, Chrome 120, Chrome 109, Edge 151, Edge 150, Edge 149, Firefox 154, Firefox 153, Firefox 152, Firefox 140, Safari/Chrome (iOS) 26.6, Safari/Chrome (iOS) 26.5, Safari/Chrome (iOS) 18.5-18.7, Opera Mobile 80, Opera 131, Opera 127, Safari (MacOS) 26.6, Safari (MacOS) 26.5, Samsung 30, Samsung 29

Javascript is disabled. khio.no should still be usable, but the user experience will be simpler.

Workshop

Detail from Anonymous Focusgroup / Critical reflections on empty objects as an experience to come 2013-2016
Detail from Anonymous Focusgroup / Critical reflections on empty objects as an experience to come 2013-2016

Testimonies and Future Blind Panel

Testimonies

09:00 – 10:30 (Meet up at main reception area 08:45)
Venue: The board room, Kunsthøgskolen i Oslo (KHiO)
2nd. Witness – approx 30 min
3rd. Witness – approx 30 min
4th. Witness – approx 30 min

Future Blind Panel

11:00 - 15:00 (Meet up at main reception area 10:45)
Venue: New theory room, Kunsthøgskolen i Oslo (KHiO)
Facilitator: Tom Wengraf

Both elements in the program are parts of the assessment procedure of Jesper Alvær's project Work, work: Staging dislocation in artistic and non artistic labour. For more information and to observe testimonies and/or panel, a preliminary registration is necessary.

Please contact:
Jesper Alvær / jespalva@khio.no / 48050535
(Limited capacity)

Link: http://artistic-research.no/jesper-alvaer-work-work/

About the panel

If a psychoanalytical frame of attention to transference and countertransference is brought to bear on the interview text and on the deliberations of the panel of people who together undertake the analysis, latent and unconscious meanings become accessible for reflection. Where narratives of personal development involving conflict and ambivalence are at issue, this may be particularly useful. Clearly, this approach to interview material posits a defended subject (Hollway and Jefferson 2000) whose motives and meanings may not be transparent to themselves, and whose account of their experience may very well differ from the version evolved by the panel members who undertake the work of interpretation. (Extract from Lynn Froggett and Tom Wengraf - Nila article on BNIM panel interpretation).